As with all Project 2026 writing and ideas, this is just a starting position. Nothing is fixed in concrete, but we must start making a plan. Project 2025 has been in progress for 50 years, and the GOP has been playing the long game. We need to have a plan in place. Opinions, ideas, and suggestions are all welcome.
The wall separating church and state was not an afterthought of the Founders; it was their firewall. Forged by men who knew firsthand the violence of religious establishment, it was designed to protect not just democracy from dogma, but religion from the corrupting hand of power.
Even deeply religious founders, likeĀ Roger Sherman, agreed that civil government should not serve the church, nor vice versa. America was meant to be pluralistic, not pious by decree.
Restore the Wall: Reclaiming the Separation of Church and State
āHistory furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government.ā
ā James MadisonāI have sworn upon the altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.ā
ā Thomas Jefferson
For nearly 250 years, the United States has maintained a bold, radical promise: that religion and government must remain separate, not just in policy, but in principle. That promise is now under siege.
This isnāt theoretical. Itās tactical. A coordinated, well-funded Christian nationalist movement is exploiting courts, school boards, and state legislatures to transform religious belief into law. They are building a theocracy from the bench to the ballot box, one ruling at a time.
Project 2026 doesnāt just aim to defend the wall between church and state. Weāre here to rebuild it.
A Founding Principle, Not a Footnote
The U.S. Constitution didnāt merely allow for religious diversity; it insisted on it. The First Amendmentās Establishment Clause makes it crystal clear:
āCongress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.ā
Yet today's Supreme Court, emboldened by decades of strategic judicial stacking, is erasing this line, one decision at a time. This is not neutrality. It is preferentialism, cloaked in liberty but born of ideology.
Legal Reality: Whatās Been Lost
In 2022, the Court officially abandoned the Lemon Testāthe standard used for decades to evaluate whether government actions improperly entangle church and state. In its place: a vague appeal to "historical practices and understandings."
InĀ Kennedy v. Bremerton, this decisionĀ upheld a public school coach leading prayers on the 50-yard line. Suddenly, government employees were reframed as private citizens during school-sponsored events.
The result? A green light for state-sanctioned religiosity cloaked in free speech.
Key Cases Accelerating Church-State Entanglement:
Trinity Lutheran v. Comer (2017) ā Public funding for religious school playgrounds.
Espinoza v. Montana (2020) ā Vouchers for religious schools cannot be excluded.
Carson v. Makin (2022) ā Maine must fund religious education via tuition programs.
Kennedy v. Bremerton (2022) ā Public prayer at public school events is permitted.
This is not neutrality. This is an establishment of religion in slow motion.
What the Founders Actually Said
Jefferson and Madison didnāt mince words. And they werenāt alone:
āThe Government of the United States is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.ā ā Treaty of Tripoli, 1797, under President John Adams
āDifference of opinion is advantageous in religion⦠ours is but one of a thousand systems.ā ā Thomas Jefferson
āThe number, the industry, and the morality of the Priesthood⦠have been manifestly increased by the total separation of Church and State.ā ā James Madison
Even the deeply religious George Washington refused to issue proclamations of prayer, wary of state intrusion into faith.
Refuting the Theocratic Playbook
āThe Founders were religiousāso the nation should be too.ā
True, but they feared state-imposed religion more than unbelief. Religious belief was to be protected, not privileged.
āLetting prayer back into schools is religious freedom.ā
When teachers or coaches lead it, itās coercion, especially for students of different or no faith.
āReligious schools deserve public funding.ā
Not when they discriminate based on gender, orientation, or belief. No public dollar should fund exclusion or indoctrination.
Real-World Examples
Ohioās EdChoice Program
Over 90% of funds go to religious schools, many of which teach creationism and exclude LGBTQ+ students.Texas State Curriculum Standards
Rewritten to emphasize Moses over Madison and downplay slaveryās role in U.S. history.Floridaās Hope Scholarship
Public funds diverted to private religious education under the guise of bullying prevention.
How Other Nations Do It
The takeaway? Theocracy degrades both liberty and belief. Secularism protects them.
Religious Rule Makes Life Worse
States with the deepest religious-right entrenchment (e.g., Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana) consistently rank lowest:
Education funding
Maternal and infant health
Life expectancy
Poverty reduction
More church in government doesnāt lead to moral clarity. It leads to public failure wrapped in piety. Moral posturing is not moral policy. Sanctimony does not yield justice.
What Project 2026 Will Do
1. Codify a Federal Ban on Religious Instruction in Public Kā12
Via the Secular Schools Protection Act, tied to Title I funding.
2. Enforce Political Neutrality in Religious Nonprofits
Restore the Johnson Amendment with teeth, including a public accountability portal.
3. End Public Funding for Discriminatory Religious Schools
Enact the Faith Funding Fairness Act: no taxpayer support without full inclusion.
4. Reestablish a Constitutional Standard for Church-State Separation
Introduce the 21st Century Lemon Standardācentered on neutrality, equity, and pluralism.
5. Create Oversight Bodies
DOJās Church-State Watch Office
White House Council on Religious Freedom Integrity
Want to Go Deeper? *Read This:
Founding Documents
The Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom ā Thomas Jefferson
Treaty of Tripoli ā U.S. Senate, 1797 - PDF Download
Recommended Books
The Godless Constitution ā Kramnick & Moore
God in the White House ā Randall Balmer
Trusted Advocacy Orgs
* Books are linked are uncompensated and some may only be available used.
ALSO: Fuck Amazon.
Final Word: This Is Not About Faith. It's About Freedom.
We are not anti-religion. We are anti-theocracy.
When politicians fund pulpits with public money, when courts privilege Christian orthodoxy over pluralism, when schools are used to indoctrinate instead of educate, we are no longer a democracy.
Letās be clear:
The wall of separation is not an attack on faith. Itās the only thing that protects it.
Go back to the beginning:
Top 25 Focus Areas for a Progressive Counter-Agenda
A couple of things - these are just my thoughts - I am not emotionally attached to any of this; itās a starting place because starting with a blank sheet is torture for most people. FEEDBACK and COLLABORATION are necessary.
You promote Communist women votes . š ļøš¤¦š» ŠŠ¾Š·ŃожГай ниŃŃŃ ŃŠ¾ŃŃŠøŃ šš»
Nothing worse than suffering under these fools madness.